Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
J Healthc Qual ; 44(3): 178-183, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1649903

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: A multidisciplinary team at a tertiary care Veterans Health Administration medical center created a standardized process to identify medically stable inpatients, to notify inpatient staff of available COVID-19 vaccine doses, and to coordinate inpatient vaccine administration. The team's goals were to mitigate vaccine waste while safely vaccinating as many patients as possible. Using a unique set of exclusion criteria and clinical judgment, a quality improvement team reviewed patients admitted to medicine teams to determine medical stability. Eligible, interested patients were listed in a secure shared file, and outpatient vaccine clinic staff communicated with inpatient nurse leaders regarding the availability of unadministered doses. Doses were transported to the hospital from the clinic and administered by inpatient nurses. Between January 8 and April 26, 2021, 105 patients were vaccinated with either the Moderna or the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine during admission. Sixty-nine percent of the patients received a first dose, 27% received a second dose, and 4% received both doses. Forty-two percent of the patients vaccinated while inpatient identified as Black or African American compared with 28% of the vaccinated outpatients. No vaccine-related safety events were reported. This process demonstrates a viable approach to mitigating waste of COVID-19 vaccines and safely, efficiently, and equitably vaccinating an inpatient population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Inpatients , Vaccination
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(3): 344-350, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1211236

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess extent of a healthcare-associated outbreak of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and to evaluate the effectiveness of infection control measures, including universal masking. DESIGN: Outbreak investigation including 4 large-scale point-prevalence surveys. SETTING: Integrated VA healthcare system with 2 facilities and 330 beds. PARTICIPANTS: Index patient and 250 exposed patients and staff. METHODS: We identified exposed patients and staff and classified them as probable and confirmed cases based on symptoms and testing. We performed a field investigation and an assessment of patient and staff interactions to develop probable transmission routes. Infection prevention interventions included droplet and contact precautions, employee quarantine, and universal masking with medical and cloth face masks. We conducted 4 point-prevalence surveys of patient and staff subsets using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Among 250 potentially exposed patients and staff, 14 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were identified. Patient roommates and staff with prolonged patient contact were most likely to be infected. The last potential date of transmission from staff to patient was day 22, the day universal masking was implemented. Subsequent point-prevalence surveys in 126 patients and 234 staff identified 0 patient cases and 5 staff cases of COVID-19, without evidence of healthcare-associated transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Universal masking with medical face masks was effective in preventing further spread of SARS-CoV-2 in our facility in conjunction with other traditional infection prevention measures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Infection Control , Quarantine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL